August 2010
This web site demonstrates the complete and organized corruption of New Jersey state government; it is a story supported by provided facts that will never appear in New Jersey newspapers.
Specifically, this web site demonstrates the protection afforded to those who are politically connected who violate civil and criminal law.
For those who do not care to verify libelous accusations the soon to follow ten statements are provable beyond a reasonable doubt.
For those who require proof regarding libelous accusations detailed evidence is provided, however the time required for the examination of the evidence is more than a few minutes, and is actually more than a few hours.
Perhaps it can be reasoned by most visitors that the following ten libelous accusations are indeed provable; presumably defamation litigation would result from egregious but unfounded accusations.
1. The Saint Barnabas Health Care System is New Jersey's largest health care system, and it criminally retaliated against a whistleblowing RN by staging a morphine theft that was attributed to the RN.
2. The whistleblowing RN eventually won a trial against the Saint Barnabas Health Care System after winning the reversal of a judicial decision that dismissed the whistleblower's litigation for being completely without merit.
But even though the whistleblower won at trial a completely corrupt New Jersey judiciary ensured the career destruction of the RN who suffered ruinous losses as a result of his conscientious action.
3. Even though the RN won at trial the New Jersey judiciary protected the Saint Barnabas Health Care System from being held accountable for the violation of both civil and criminal law.
4. Christopher Christie was a corrupt United States Attorney, and is presently a corrupt New Jersey governor who covered up and continues to protect egregious public corruption.
5. Ocean County (New Jersey) state representatives David Wolfe, James Holzapfel, and Andrew Ciesla are corrupt lawmakers who protect a demonstrably corrupt Ocean County judiciary regarding the sale of criminal and civil law.
6. The New Jersey oversight entity for the state's judiciary covers up evidence of the judiciary's corruption.
7. The media in New Jersey conceals from the public evidence of organized governmental corruption; indeed, a completely corrupt government could not exist without the aid of a corrupt media.
8. The media in New Jersey conceals from the public criminal and civil wrong doing by the Saint Barnabas Health Care System.
9. The whistleblowing RN's effort to expose organized governmental corruption in New Jersey was threatened by a governmental attempt to suppress First Amendment constitutional rights regarding freedom of speech.
10. The American Nurses Association and the New Jersey State Nurses Association are corrupt organizations that concealed from its members the presumably rare story of a trial win by a whistleblowing RN who represented himself against New Jersey's largest health care system.
-----------
The following presentation on this page and on subsequent pages is for those who require proof regarding egregious allegations.
Unsupported allegations are meaningless, therefore every claim made throughout this web site regarding criminal retaliation, judicial corruption, and the cover up of judicial corruption is supported by tangible, unambiguous, and irrefutable evidence that is provided herein.
This web site demonstrates not only the cover up by the New Jersey Supreme Court of undeniable judicial corruption of subordinate courts, but it also demonstrates that the New Jersey Supreme Court blatantly disregarded its own precedent position regarding the whistleblowing law, and that it condoned the sale of both civil and criminal law to a politically-connected interest.
The tangible evidence of governmental corruption presented in this web site will instill fear of the legal system into all (who are politically unconnected) who examine it.
To paraphrase a popular television cable news network, I provide the facts, you decide. However, the evidence of corruption is detailed, and an understanding of that evidence requires both reason and thoughtful consideration of the arguments that are presented.
-----------------------------
The presentation of the mobile billboard shown in the above photo is a frequent occurrence in front of the Ocean County Court House for about an hour at a time usually at noon.
The Asbury Park Press is the area's largest newspaper, and is New Jersey's second largest newspaper......
the ignoring by the Asbury Park Press of a prominent and repeated accusation of judicial corruption gives credibility to the claim that it is a corrupt newspaper and that it enables pervasive governmental corruption in Ocean County.
Visitors to this web site can examine the detailed evidence of judicial corruption that was ignored by the Asbury Park Press.
Frank Buczynski, who lives in Forked River, New Jersey (see photo above) was the trial judge who corruptly used my technical trial error as an excuse to defeat the primary intent of the whistleblowing law.
It is well known that the legislative intent of the whistleblowing law is to ensure the award of remedies to a whistleblower who wins at trial; Buczynski made sure that I received no remedies even though I won at trial.
Remedies refers to the reinstatement of employment after a whistleblower has been wrongly terminated, to the return of lost wages, to the return of legal fees that were incurred as a result of fighting the illegal actions of an employer, and to the assessment of damages regarding the violation of civil and/or criminal law.
A recent appointee to the United States Supreme Court stated the well-known task of a judge:
"the task of a judge is not to make law, it is to apply the law".
In this case not only Buczynski but numerous other judges in addition to every justice of New Jersey Supreme Court demonstrated that they are unquestionably corrupt.
The above photo was taken in front of the Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex that is the home of the New Jersey Supreme Court. Stuart Rabner is the Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court.
This web site demonstrates that the New Jersey Supreme Court is neither conservative or liberal but rather completely corrupt, and that it will sell civil and criminal law to those who can buy it via political connection.
----------------------------------------
An unfounded and easily disproven allegation of corruption against a judge would presumably result in defamation litigation by that judge against the person who made the allegation.
Also presumably, a well-supported allegation of egregious corruption against a judge would necessarily result in disciplinary action against that judge.
Accordingly, only in a completely corrupt state could a citizen prominently accuse of corruption not only a local superior court judge but also the state's chief justice and subsequently precipitate no reaction.
Chief Justice Rabner and Ocean County Superior Court Judge Buczynski sold civil and criminal law; nothing can erase that provable fact, and the passage of time cannot erase the fact of their corruption.
Rabner and Buczynski sold the law once, and they will sell it again.
The evidence of that sale of law was either covered up or stonewalled by every branch of New Jersey state government.
Rabner and Buczynski remain in positions of trust because of Christie's corruption, and because of a completely corrupt legislature.
It is therefore accurate to claim that New Jersey's state government is completely corrupt.
--------------------
At this point in the story that is told by this web site a visitor should ask himself three questions:
1. "Am I affected by the corruption up of a judge, of a policeman, or of any other public servant who is in turn protected by a corrupt government?"
2. "Is it possible that I could ever be the victim of a corrupt public servant who is in turn protected by a corrupt government?"
3. "Is it possible that I could be affected by the decision of a demonstrably-corrupt New Jersey Supreme Court that makes decisions not on the basis of law but rather on the strength of a litigant's political connection?"
Unless the answer to at least one of the above questions is 'yes' the visitor to this web site is waisting his time.
------------------------------------------------
Attempt to suppress freedom of speech
This web site demonstrates the attempt by the town in which I live, Seaside Park, to deny my First Amendment rights regarding my effort to disseminate evidence of high-level New Jersey state governmental corruption.
Pervasive New Jersey governmental corruption is sure to continue when efforts to expose corruption are frustrated rather than applauded.
Prior to displaying the truck-mounted billboard (shown above) I obtained the authorization for the display by the local code enforcement officer, by the local police department, and by the New Jersey State Police.
I also submitted an inquiry to the New Jersey Attorney General's office regarding my plan to display a mobile billboard, and that inquiry was forwarded to the Motor Vehicle Commission; I was subsequently informed that the display of a mobile billboard was part of my First Amendment rights:
(click to see a complete photocopy of the letter from the MVC that confirms my First Amendment rights, then click the Back button/left-pointing arrow in the upper left screen to return)
Informed New Jersey citizens are presumably aware that the New Jersey Attorney General (NJAG) enables corruption; those who click to see the complete copy of the letter from the MVC (above) will see that I stated my intention to display a banner urging the support for those who are serving in the United States military; I was not going to inform the NJAG that I intended to disseminate evidence of high level state corruption.
There is no difference as far as the First Amendment is concerned between a banner that urges the support for troops and a banner that announces evidence of governmental corruption.
First Amendment rights verified by the MVC (that was tasked to make that determination by the NJAG) are not relinquished upon entering any city or town in the United States.
After displaying the truck-mounted billboard for more than a year while parked in front of my residence I was abruptly threatened with the issuing of a summons that could result in a $1000 fine and/or 90 days in jail; I will receive those penalties if I continue to park my truck (with attached billboard) on a public street or drive it on a public right of way.
I presented at a Seaside Park town council meeting regarding the transparent harassment of my effort to expose organized state corruption. At that meeting the council refused to answer my question "does this council want Ocean County corruption exposed?"
It is not inappropriate for a town council to advocate the exposure of public corruption; indeed, silence by a town council in the face of undeniable corruption is corruption itself.
In addition, the town's double-talking attorney at the aforementioned council meeting stated that the letter from the MVC (above) did not confirm my First Amendment rights but rather stated only that I did not need commercial plates in order to display a non-commercial banner.
The trumped-up excuse for the abrupt threat is specified by municiple Code 25-624E...
Christie's Corruption ----------------------------
According to the official Borough of Seaside Park Code the definition of sign is:
SIGN- Any announcement, display, advertisement or illustration placed to be seen from any street or public way.
An advertising sign painted on a commercial vehicle can presumably be seen from the street.
A bumper sticker on a vehicle can also presumably be seen from the street, and is by the town's definition a sign.
Therefore, according to the trumped-up excuse used to attempt to deny my First Amendment rights no commercial vehicle with an affixed sign and no vehicle having a bumper sticker can exist in Seaside Park without prior approval of the governing body.
(click to see the complete violation notice, then click the Back button located in the upper left hand corner of the screen to return)
Clearly, Code 25-624E refers to the erection of signs on public property, for example on the lawn in front of the town hall, and does not refer to vehicular commercial or non-commercial signs, and does not refer to vehicle-mounted bumper stickers.
Code 25-624E certainly cannot legitimately refer to vehicle-mounted billboards that exposes governmental corruption.
No town in the United States can pass an ordinance or create a code that infringes on a citizen's constitutional rights.
However, corrupt town officials working with corrupt municipal judges can indeed take away constitutional rights when they are aided by a completely corrupt state government that is shielded from the public by a corrupt media.
The citizens of New Jersey should be able to understand that the tentacles of corruption extend from regional political bosses to small towns like Seaside Park.
I encountered only four judges at the local Ocean County Superior Court, but all of those judges (following) were demonstrable liars who sold civil and criminal law to a connected interest.
Eugene Serpentelli
Edward Oles
Frank Buczynski
Thomas O'Brien
The corruption of the Ocean County Prosecutor can also be demonstrated; in my case former prosecutor Thomas Kelaher (who is currently Toms River mayor) stonewalled the evidence of the violation of criminal law by a connected interest.
Presumably the citizens of Ocean County have a need to know that their legal system is demonstrably corrupt; they are not going to get that information from the local newspaper the Asbury Park Press.
-----------------------------------
Tangible evidence is presented in this web site that demonstrates New Jersey governor Christopher Christie's servitude to a special interest that was manifested by his attempted cover up not only of egregious public corruption but also of violation of federal law.
Christie, New Jersey’s supposed champion corruption fighter and former United States Attorney for New Jersey, is in reality a demonstrable liar and a posturing phony regarding the fight against corruption.
Christie protected the undeniable corruption in my case that exemplifies a significantly greater threat to New Jersey's citizens than any of his well-reported targets regarding his posturing fight against corruption.
There can be no credible argument against the premise that a corrupt judiciary is a significantly greater threat to the people than is a public official like a mayor, a lawmaker, or a building inspector who takes a bribe.
There are few, if any, greater examples of betrayal of trust than that of a corrupt judge who sells not only civil law but also criminal law.
Christie's betrayal of trust regarding his protection of organized governmental corruption is arguably more egregious than that of any of the targets of his office regarding public corruption.
Christie's turning a blind eye to the judicial sale of civil and criminal law, especially when the New Jersey Supreme Court condoned that sale, is not the practice of politics but is rather an act of blatant corruption in return for obvious political support regarding his bid to become New Jersey governor.
While serving as a federal attorney for New Jersey Christie frequently and hypocritically condemned the betrayal of trust by convicted targets of his office regarding his posturing fight against corruption.
Only the citizens of the most corrupt state in the nation could elect a corrupt candidate like Christie to be their governor; this occurred on 3 November 2009.
NEW JERSEY VOTERS AND CORRUPTION...
PERFECT TOGETHER
New Jersey is presently addressing serious economic problems caused solely by a corrupt government controlled by both Republicans and Democrats.
However it cannot be credibly argued that New Jersey's economic problems can be solved without first eliminating much of the organized governmental corruption that is clearly illustrated by this web site.
The addressing of New Jersey's economic crisis by Christie does not prevent him from ensuring that corrupt judges are held accountable and removed from positions of trust, but he will take no action because of his own corruption, his self interests, and his service to a special interest.
Christie will surely allow organized governmental corruption in New Jersey to continue and to flourish; it is suggested that his effort to fix New Jersey's economic crisis is motivated solely by the bosses' desire to keep alive the goose that lays for them golden eggs.
All except the corrupt, specifically corrupt political bosses and those who are protected by them, will suffer during Christie's term in office.
Without doubt there are New Jersey voters who were aware of Christie's corruption yet voted for him nevertheless; the pervasive nature of these morally corrupt voters is is why New Jersey government is destined to remain completely corrupt.
Among those who were aware of the evidence of Christie's corruption were elected town officials who endorsed him, but the fight against corruption in Trenton (for New Jersey citizens) starts at the local level by voters who hold those elected town officials accountable for supporting a corrupt candidate.
The fight against pervasive New Jersey governmental corruption must start at the local level by elected officials who presumably are more easily held accountable for their actions; they must not merely withhold endorsement of demonstrably corrupt candidates but they must also expose those candidates' corruption regardless of party affiliation; to act otherwise exposes the irresponsibility and likely corruption of those local leaders.
Pre-trial Judicial Corruption
Prior to winning at trial the whistleblower's litigation was dismissed by a corrupt judge named Edward Oles who attempted to completely conceal evidence of criminal retaliation.
At the time he dismissed the litigation Oles stated in writing that "there is absolutely" no evidence in the whistleblower's favor.
The whistleblowing RN, representing himself after losing more than $50,000 to a succession* of disappointing lawyers two of whom told the whistleblower that his case was weak, not only won an appeal of Oles' dismissal but won a subsequent six-day jury trial.
*The first of these four lawyers, Ben Zander, was recently disbarred by a hypocritical and corrupt New Jersey Supreme Court that sold criminal and civil law to the Saint Barnabas Health Care System; Zander had previously been convicted of a felony in federal court. Regarding the supposed weakness of the whistleblower's case it is not inconceivable that his lawyers were corrupted by his former employer that represents New Jersey's largest health care system.
-------------------------------------
Corrupt Trial Judge
The RN won at trial while making his first appearance before a jury, while fighting a well-experienced trial lawyer, and while fighting a corrupt trial judge who demonstrably attempted to sabotage the whistleblower's case before the jury.
The conditions under which the whistleblower won at trial implies the strength of the evidence that Oles attempted to conceal when he dismissed the whistleblower's case for being supposedly completely without merit.
Although the whistleblowing RN won at trial a corrupt trial judge ignored the unquestionable intent of the law, ignored a sworn oath to apply the law, and used a technical error by the whistleblower as an excuse to completely deny to him compensation for his losses that included five years of lost wages and (at the time of trial) $50,000 lost to legal fees.
The aforementioned corrupt trial judge, Frank Buczynski, also brazenly protected the whistleblower's former employer regarding its criminal retaliation; Buczynski contradicted the decision of a higher court (and disregarded the evidence at trial), and stated on record during trial (in front of the jury) that the issue regarding criminal retaliation was irrelevant, and he ensured that a jury did not address that issue.
Disregarding a pre-trial appellate court's (a higher court) opinion, and disregarding the jury's decision Buczynski stated on record that the whistleblowing RN's termination was justified:
Buczynski ensured that the whistleblower although winning at trial maximally suffered for his act of looking out for others who could not look out for themselves, and he ensured that the whistleblower's former employer was protected regarding the violation of not only civil law but also criminal law.
-------------------------------------------
Buying Oversight, Buying Awards
This web site demonstrates that New Jersey's largest health care system can buy not only protection by local superior courts, but that it can buy protection by the state's highest court as well as protection by the federal attorney for New Jersey.
It can therefore be presumed that New Jersey's largest health care provider can buy the results of private and public investigations into its operations.
It can also be presumed that New Jersey's largest health care system can buy awards and favorable mention in New Jersey's demonstrably-corrupt media.
Community Medical Center is an affiliate of the Saint Barnabas Health Care System, and it is the hospital where a whistleblowing RN was criminally set up for morphine theft.
--------------------------------------
Corrupt Oversight
This story also demonstrates the cover up of judicial corruption by the entity tasked to provide oversight to the judiciary, namely the Advisory Committee for Judicial Conduct.
Only in the most corrupt state in the nation could an oversight entity cover up evidence of corruption.
As an example, judge Frank Buczynski was cleared of wrong doing by the Advisory Committee for Judicial Conduct yet this web site contains the tangible evidence that Buczynski is a corrupt judge and a deceiving liar; it would seem therefore that Buczynski has ample ground to litigate against me for defamation (see photo above).
The investigator for the Advisory Committee for Judicial Conduct who covered up the evidence of Buczynski's corruption has an annual salary (in 2009) of $90,000; the investigator's name is John Tonelli. The primary motivation for the pervasive corruption in my case, in the absence of a direct bribe, can be nothing other than the securing of a high-paying job that is coupled to excellent job benefits.
----------------------------
Corrupt lawmakers
I will demonstrate the corruption of multiple New Jersey state legislators that include Ocean County (New Jersey) senator Andrew Ciesla and assemblymen James Holzapfel and David Wolfe (all three Republicans). The evidence regarding the blatant sale of civil and criminal law in my case demands the exercise of the balances upon which the three-branch system of government is based, and the refusal to merely acknowledge the detailed supplied evidence of judicial corruption is clear evidence of their (Ciesla, Holzapfel, and Wolfe) corruption by the same forces that corrupted the Ocean County judiciary.
There are few duties more important for a lawmaker than to ensure that their constituents are served by an honest judiciary that honors the clear intent of the law, yet the corrupt Republican lawmakers mentioned above will without a doubt be re-elected by an ignorant and/or unethical constituency that ignores the evidence of those lawmakers' corruption.
------------------
TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
The above slogan is the rallying cry of the Tea Party. In general Democratic and Republican lawmakers are not representing the people but rather themselves and special interests.
It seems that the Tea Party, that omits from its primary objectives the prosecution of undeniable and ubiquitous governmental corruption, will overlook the demonstrable corruption of a candidate or of an elected official as long as he postures consistent with the Tea Party line.
------------------------------------------
Media corruption
The people's best defense against a corrupt government is an honest media, however New Jersey corruption has flourished to the point of bankrupting the state arguably because the same forces that have corrupted the government have also corrupted the media.
It is not the corruption of individual lawmakers, mayors, or small-time officials that is destroying New Jersey, but rather it is organized governmental corruption that is responsible for that destruction.
Litigation that is remarkable for repeated and blatant judicial corruption that includes the demonstrable corruption of the state's highest court is newsworthy; that such litigation was not reported by the media is credible evidence that the media too is corrupt.
Two of New Jersey's largest newspapers, the Asbury Park Press and the Newark Star Ledger, ignored a newsworthy win after a six-day trial by a whistleblowing registered nurse who represented himself against New Jersey's largest health care system, and ignored the egregious and tangible evidence of corruption at the highest level of state government that this case exposed.
The two newspaper headlines that appear on this page were published by a transparently-biased local publication known as the Ocean County Observer that is now out of business.
As will be shown in this web site the evidence of criminal retaliation and judicial corruption is overwhelming, yet the Ocean County Observer made no mention whatsoever of that evidence.
----------------------------------------------
Corrupt nursing organizations A music video that demonstrates the frustration and outrage directed by many Americans toward their government can be seen by clicking; it is certainly a video that applies to the completely corrupt New Jersey government that is illustrated by this web site.
I will demonstrate to the members of the New Jersey nursing profession that the New Jersey State Nurses Association and the American Nurses Association completely and unethically ignored the win at trial of a whistleblowing registered nurse, that those organizations refused to call public attention to the malicious destruction of a registered nurse who tried to protect those who could not protect themselves, and that those organizations refused to warn fellow nurses that the whistle blowing law in New Jersey is worthless and that it provides no protection from unethical but well-connected employers who can buy the protection of New Jersey’s corrupt judiciary.
Perhaps the aforementioned nursing organizations covered up the story of a trial-winning, whistleblowing RN because it involved nurses who criminally conspired with an employer to retaliate against a whistleblower; the detailed evidence of that criminal conspiracy is provided.
---------------------------------------------
The lyrics of the music video specifically mentions:
-the government's ignoring of the people's demand for accountability
-the hypocracy of our elected leaders
-the refusal of some victims to fade away into the night
------------------------------------------
Readers of this web site will see that I appealed the outcome of a trial that I won, an outcome that denied to me compensation for my ruinous losses as a result of criminal actions taken against me by the Saint Barnabas Heath Care System; those readers will easily recognize the repeated and brazen judicial corruption that I encountered before and after my trial.
The New Jersey Supreme Court denied my appeal for a new trial, but my case did not end with the decision of that demonstrably corrupt court; legal actions can only end as a result of lawful judicial decisions that adhere to clear legislative intent.
My case will end when I receive a fair trial in accordance with established-via-precedent legislative intent.
Evidence of public corruption is not erased when a new governor takes the oath of office, nor can the stonewalling and/or cover up of that evidence by a corrupt government (until a statute of limitation occurs) result in its being erased.
Those corrupt elected and appointed officials associated with my case cannot be exonerated (regarding their corruption) by the passage of time.
My case will end when the associated elected and appointed officials are held accountable for their corruption; I understand that in a corrupt New Jersey this accountability is unlikely, however I am unwilling to be a silent victim of corruption therefore I will continue to disseminate the associated evidence.
-------------------------------------------------
David A. Miller
Back to the top
